Skip to main content

Cursor developers
for features in the codebase you already have.

Hire senior engineers who use Cursor to ship roadmap features, refactor fragile code, and stop new releases breaking old features. Cursor speeds up the work. Senior review keeps your codebase stable.

Discuss a Cursor project
See our delivery process

Free first call. A senior engineer reviews your project and replies within one business day.

Works in your codebaseSenior code reviewDocumented handoff

Accelerated by

LovableLovable
CursorCursor
ReplitReplit
Bolt
CopilotCopilot
KiroKiro
AntigravityAntigravity
Anything
v0
Figma MakeFigma Make
LovableLovable
CursorCursor
ReplitReplit
Bolt
CopilotCopilot
KiroKiro
AntigravityAntigravity
Anything
v0
Figma MakeFigma Make

In short

What are Cursor developers?

Hire senior engineers who use Cursor to ship roadmap features, refactor fragile code, and stop new releases breaking old features. Cursor speeds up the work. Senior review keeps your codebase stable.

Where Cursor helps most

  • Roadmap features
  • Refactoring fragile code
  • Reliability work
  • Adding capacity without hiring

How we work

  • The same senior engineers from kickoff to handoff.
  • Weekly progress you can see and try.
  • Every change reviewed by a senior engineer.
  • You own the code, the docs, and the accounts.
Cursor Explained

What Cursor does, and what we do

The AI tool speeds up the build. Senior engineers make the architecture, testing, and release decisions.

WHERE CURSOR HELPS

  • -Reads and edits code across your existing repository.
  • -Shows what a change will affect before you make it.
  • -Speeds up changes that touch many files.
  • -Leaves architecture decisions to an engineer.

HOW CODIVOX USES CURSOR

  • +We read your codebase before we recommend anything.
  • +We agree a clearly scoped piece of work and what "done" means.
  • +We build it in your repository, using your review process.
  • +A senior engineer reviews every change before it merges.
  • +You get the code, the tests, and the reasoning.

“Cursor makes the work faster. What you're hiring is senior judgment about what to change, and what to leave alone.”

Project fit and ownership

When hiring Cursor developers is a good fit

Best when you already have a product and need more senior engineering capacity inside it.

Good fit

  • A specific feature or clean-up in a repository that already exists.
  • React, Next.js, Node, or TypeScript work with clear boundaries.
  • You want extra senior capacity without giving up ownership of the product.
  • We can work inside your existing repository, build pipeline, and code review.

Not a fit

  • Open-ended exploration with no agreed outcome.
  • Work where nobody can review or release anything.
  • Merging AI-generated code without senior review.

We choose tools per project: AI speed where it helps, senior review where the risk is. If another tool suits your project better, we'll tell you.

Engagement model

A fixed price for an agreed scope, or a monthly plan for an ongoing backlog.

We can own a clearly scoped piece of work end to end, or work inside your team using your repository and review process.

Handoff includes

  • The code, with a readable history of what changed.
  • The tests, and what we checked before release.
  • Notes on the key architecture decisions.
  • What we'd do next, in priority order.
Delivery Flow

From fast Cursor work to software you can launch

Cursor gives us a head start. A senior engineer still decides how it's built, reviews it, and signs off the release.

The plan

How a Cursor engagement moves from scope to handoff

Senior-led
1

Look

Scope

We read your codebase, then agree the exact piece of work, what's out of scope, and what finished looks like.

2

Build

Cursor

We build it with Cursor handling the repetitive work, while a senior engineer makes the architecture decisions.

3

Check

Review

A senior engineer reviews every change, and we add tests on the journeys that matter most.

4

Release

Handoff

We release it with a rollback plan, hand over the code and docs, and recommend what to do next.

Typical deliverables

Roadmap feature delivery

Ship the features on your roadmap, in code you can keep.

Refactoring engagements

Make fragile code safe to change, without pausing the roadmap.

Reliability work

Fewer regressions, with tests on the journeys that matter most.

Illustrative scopes

Examples of bounded Cursor work

These are typical scopes, not results we're promising for yours. Your quote depends on your codebase and what you need it to do.

Cursor + Next.js + PostgresIllustrative scope

Rebuild sign-up and billing, with tests on each step of the payment flow and a way to roll back.

Cursor + React + Node.jsIllustrative scope

Tidy the busiest parts of an API so new features stop breaking old ones.

Cursor + TypeScriptIllustrative scope

Build an internal tool that takes a repetitive weekly task off the team.

Delivery Risk

What changes when a senior engineer leads the work

Writing code faster only helps if your product still works when real users arrive.

WHAT GOES WRONG WITHOUT US

  • -Fast changes that no senior engineer has reviewed.
  • -Architecture decisions scattered across commits, never written down.
  • -New features quietly breaking old ones.
  • -AI-generated code merged without anyone checking it.

WHAT WE DO ABOUT IT

  • +Every change reviewed by a senior engineer.
  • +Architecture decisions documented as we go.
  • +Tests on the journeys your business depends on.
  • +Releases you can roll back if something goes wrong.
Problems Found
// Raw AI output
function handleClick() {
fetch('/api/data')
.then(r => r.json())
}
❌ No error handling❌ No types❌ No validation
Production Ready
// After Codivox review
async function handleClick() {
try {
setLoading(true);
const data = await api.fetch();
validateResponse(data);
} catch (error) {
handleError(error);
}
}
✓ Error handling✓ Type safe✓ Validated

You get speed and reliability.

Why Codivox

Why people pick us for Cursor work

Senior engineers lead the work, the scope is agreed in writing, every change is reviewed, and you own everything at the end.

1
The same senior engineers from kickoff to handoff.
2
Weekly progress you can see and try.
3
Every change reviewed by a senior engineer.
4
You own the code, the docs, and the accounts.

Cursor speeds up the work. Our review standard stays the same.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before hiring Cursor developers

Straight answers on pricing, ownership, and how we work. If yours isn't here, ask us.

Is Cursor better than GitHub Copilot?
It depends on the job. Cursor is an AI-first editor that is strong at changes spread across many files. Copilot plugs into editors your team may already use and is strong at suggestions as you type. Both keep adding features, so we pick per task rather than per brand.
Can you work on our existing codebase?
Yes, most of our Cursor work happens in existing codebases. We read the code first, agree a clearly scoped piece of work, and make the changes in your repository through your normal code review.
Can you work alongside our own developers?
Yes, and we often do. We work in your repository, follow your code review process, and use your build pipeline, so our changes arrive the same way your own team's do.
How much does it cost to hire Cursor developers?
Most projects are a fixed price for an agreed scope, so you know the cost before work starts. The price depends on how many screens and features you need, what it connects to (payments, CRMs, other APIs), and your deadline. As a reference point, MVP builds start at $1,999 and ongoing monthly work at $2,999 per month. After a free call, you get a written plan and a quote.
Who owns the code?
You do, from day one. The code, the documentation, and the accounts are yours. We work as your delivery team, and nothing is locked to us.
What happens in the first week?
We review the code (or your idea), agree what's in scope and what isn't, flag the main risks, and give you a plan with dates. Building starts once you're happy with it.
Have a question about your own build? Ask a senior engineer.

Research basis

Source notes for Cursor

The links below are the tool makers' own pages. Everything else here is our view, not a promise from them, and not a claim about what your project will do.

Primary source: Cursor

Explore next

Senior teams for other tools

Each AI tool suits different work. Compare them, or ask us which one fits your project.

Browse all tool experts

Antigravity Developers

Hire Antigravity developers to find what is wrong with your codebase first. Senior engineers then fix the parts that matter most.

Lovable Developers

Hire Lovable developers to take a working build and make it safe to sell. We rebuild what will not hold and hand you the code.

Replit Developers

Hire Replit developers for first versions, internal tools, and prototypes. We make them hold up, then hand you the code and the logins.

Kiro Developers

Hire Kiro developers who write the spec first. Senior engineers turn it into working software, test it, and hand over clean code.

Copilot Developers

Hire GitHub Copilot developers. Senior engineers keep the quality bar while Copilot takes repetitive coding out of the day.

Bolt Developers

Hire Bolt.new developers to turn a fast draft into something you can launch. We keep the good parts and rebuild what will not hold.

Ready to start

Need experienced Cursor developers in your codebase?

Send us your code, your backlog, or the problem you're stuck on. We'll reply within one business day, and on a free call we'll agree the scope and give you a plan before any code is written.

Discuss a Cursor project
See our delivery process
Free first callReply within one business dayYou own the code and IP