Codivox Research · 2026
Med Spa Website Statistics & Benchmarks
We ran our own Med Spa Website Grader against 45 real med spa / aesthetics websites — no survey, no borrowed stats. Here's how they scored and what most get wrong.
By the Codivox Research team · 45 graded of 46 sampled · Updated July 5, 2026
The median Med Spa homepage scores 80 out of 100 against the six-category Med Spa Website Grader rubric, and 46.6% score a C or lower — based on 45 real U.S. med spa / aesthetics websites Codivox graded in 2026.
80/100
Median homepage score
Across 45 graded med spa homepages (mean 78.1).
46.6%
Scored a C or lower
Grade C, D or F against the Med Spa Website Grader rubric.
Local SEO & Discovery
Weakest category
Category mean of just 52.6/100 — the biggest opportunity.
66.7%
Missing: city in title tag
The single most common gap on med spa homepages.
Key med spa website statistics (2026)
The headline numbers from our 45-homepage audit. Quote or cite any of them — each is a real, measured figure.
- The median Med Spa homepage scored 80/100 (mean 78.1).
- 46.6% of graded Med Spa homepages scored a C or lower.
- 20% earned an A (90+), while 4.4% scored an F (below 50).
- Homepage scores ranged from 5 to 95 out of 100.
- Local SEO & Discovery was the weakest category, averaging 52.6/100.
- 66.7% of Med Spa homepages were missing city in title tag (Local SEO & Discovery).
- 62.2% of Med Spa homepages were missing before/after gallery (Trust, Proof & Compliance).
- 44.4% of Med Spa homepages were missing google maps / reviews (Local SEO & Discovery).
- 37.8% of Med Spa homepages were missing financing (cherry/carecredit) (Financing & Offers).
- 33.3% of Med Spa homepages were missing https + privacy notice (Trust, Proof & Compliance).
- Sample: 45 real U.S. med spa / aesthetics websites, graded July 2026.
Cite this research
Codivox. (2026). Med Spa Website Statistics 2026. Retrieved from https://codivox.com/research/state-of-medspa-websites/
The biggest homepage gaps
The elements most often missing from med spa homepages, ranked by how many sites lack them.
66.7%
missing city in title tag
Local SEO & Discovery
62.2%
missing before/after gallery
Trust, Proof & Compliance
44.4%
missing google maps / reviews
Local SEO & Discovery
37.8%
missing financing (cherry/carecredit)
Financing & Offers
33.3%
missing https + privacy notice
Trust, Proof & Compliance
Grade distribution
n = 45 · range 5–95
| Grade | Score | Sites | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 90-100 | 9 | 20% |
| B | 80-89 | 15 | 33.3% |
| C | 65-79 | 17 | 37.8% |
| D | 50-64 | 2 | 4.4% |
| F | < 50 | 2 | 4.4% |
Category scores
Mean score per weighted category
| Category | Weight | Mean |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile & Performance | 10% | 96.7 |
| Treatment Clarity & Menu | 20% | 89.7 |
| Consultation & Booking Conversion | 25% | 83.3 |
| Financing & Offers | 10% | 78.9 |
| Trust, Proof & Compliance | 20% | 69.4 |
| Local SEO & Discovery | 15% | 52.6 |
Signal prevalence — the citable table
Share of the 45 graded homepages where each signal was detected (ascending — biggest gaps first).
| Category | Signal | Present | Missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local SEO & Discovery | City in title tag | 33.3% | 66.7% |
| Trust, Proof & Compliance | Before/after gallery | 37.8% | 62.2% |
| Local SEO & Discovery | Google Maps / reviews | 55.6% | 44.4% |
| Financing & Offers | Financing (Cherry/CareCredit) | 62.2% | 37.8% |
| Trust, Proof & Compliance | HTTPS + privacy notice | 66.7% | 33.3% |
| Consultation & Booking Conversion | Click-to-call (tel:) | 68.9% | 31.1% |
| Local SEO & Discovery | MedicalBusiness/LocalBusiness schema | 68.9% | 31.1% |
| Treatment Clarity & Menu | Pricing guidance | 75.6% | 24.4% |
| Consultation & Booking Conversion | Online booking | 82.2% | 17.8% |
| Trust, Proof & Compliance | Provider credentials | 84.4% | 15.6% |
| Consultation & Booking Conversion | Book-a-consultation CTA | 86.7% | 13.3% |
| Trust, Proof & Compliance | Reviews / testimonials | 88.9% | 11.1% |
| Consultation & Booking Conversion | Short path to book | 95.6% | 4.4% |
| Treatment Clarity & Menu | Treatment clarity (who/process/results) | 95.6% | 4.4% |
| Financing & Offers | New-client offers / membership | 95.6% | 4.4% |
| Mobile & Performance | Mobile-responsive | 95.6% | 4.4% |
| Treatment Clarity & Menu | Per-treatment pages | 97.8% | 2.2% |
| Mobile & Performance | Performance hygiene (defer/lazy) | 97.8% | 2.2% |
Want a med spa website that books consultations?
Bring this score to a senior engineer. We'll turn these fixes into a fast, trustworthy site with frictionless booking, before/after galleries, and financing that converts high-ticket consultations.
Methodology
Sample. 46 U.S. med spa / aesthetics websites sourced from organic search across ~6 U.S. metros (independent med spas and aesthetics clinics; directories like RealSelf excluded). Directories/aggregators were excluded. 45 were successfully graded; 1 could not be fetched.
Scoring. Each homepage scores on the Med Spa Website Grader's six weighted categories (see table). A category score is the share of its signals present; the overall score is the weighted sum. Grades: A ≥ 90, B ≥ 80, C ≥ 65, D ≥ 50, else F.
Detection. Signals are detected in homepage HTML using the same patterns as the Codivox website analyzer, plus med spa-specific heuristics.
More industry reports
See all 13Part of 1,000 homepages graded across 13 industries.
Ready to ship your next product?
Tell us what you're building. Senior engineers will scope, plan, and start delivering your product with production-ready architecture - fast.